Reading Geoffrey Boycott’s book, it’s discovering that Boycott wasn’t alone in hitting fewer sixes. The earlier batsmen were more hampered with lighter bats, uncovered pitches and playing less international cricket . The modern batsman is blessed with beautifully manicured wickets, where the ball plays true on the bounce.
Chris Cairns of New Zealand (87 sixes) retired in 2004 with a Test batting average at number seven (44.02) is the 5th best average for that position of all time. Compare his sixes hitting with Botham’s (67 x6) and you’ve got an interesting comparison.
Adam Gilchrist the record holder (100 sixes). Fastest double hundred (212 balls). This was eight balls quicker than Ian Botham’s innings against India at The Oval in 1982.
Brian Lara scored 88 x6′s, the difference with Lara was that he was a selfish player who enjoyed converting his fifties into 34 big hundreds, hence his higher run aggregate. However, these guys all play far less cricket for their counties and more or less play internationals all year round.
In summing up which era could claim to have the greatest players, then it’s a case of balancing up the relative performances in all first class cricket. Modern players play far more ODI’s and therefore have impressive strike rates. Post war players, expressed themselves, see Keith Miller’s exploits for Australia. In my eyes, the older players shade it, because they played on uncovered pitches.